RepOne Consulting
CPM Scheduling | Construction Expert

duct shop drawings

Part 2/4, MEP Coordination: Example of Shop Drawings and Detailing

A good example of an installation that typically requires shop drawing preparation and submittals would be galvanized steel duct-work distribution for a forced air system, which is a sub-component of many heating-ventilation-air-conditioning (HVAC) designs. Such a system must be properly dimensioned, detailed, and depicted not only in itself, but in relation to adjoining structure or program – typically between the floor or deck above and the finished dropped ceiling below.

First, the fabricator will generate schematics that represent the general design concept, are useful to verify constructability, and impart a general sense of material and labor needed to perform the work. These are typically based on the design drawings and pre-construction site visit. These schematics may be run by the engineer for his opinion, however, they are not always a required submittal (check the specification submittal requirements for each trade).

Subsequent to preparing schematics, the contractor may pre-submit his shop drawings for approval to the design team based on his schematics, which will have incorporated the design drawings. These drawings will show expected routing and rough dimensions of the duct system, including equipment, such as air-handlers, fan-coil units, etc. Despite claims to the contrary, ductwork can seldom be fabricated according to such preliminary submittals.

Although initial or preliminary shop drawings may not as yet be fully dimensioned, the engineer may issue approval pending final details. The reason partially dimensioned or incomplete shop drawings are often issued is to save time, as HVAC systems are usually in the critical-path of the schedule. For example, the fabricator may order his material while he awaits field dimensioning. In either case, a set of as-builts is typically issued at the completion of the work to represent the actual installation.

While duct shop drawings may be submitted for approval before dimensions can be finalized in the field, many details need to be refined before fabrication can start, such as:

  • Top and bottom of duct dimensions from finished floor – especially where duct is stacked or intersects
  • Lengths of ductwork, especially where duct sizes change or transition
  • Direct take-offs from equipment supplies and returns
  • Offsets from intersecting elements, and adjacent program and framing, some of which may not be in place
  • Dimensioning of turning radii
  • Final dimensions, including fittings and insulation that make clearances changeable

Naturally, the engineer and architect will eventually want to know this information; however, they may give partial approval to shop drawings pending final dimensions, in order to allow the fabricator to save time, or resubmit.

Another reason why it’s risky and likely ill-conceived for the contractor to fabricate before major framing elements are in place is because there is always a strong likelihood that not everything will be constructed as planned, or unforeseen or hidden conditions necessitate a change of plan. If material needs to be refabricated because it was not properly coordinated or dimensioned the contractor will be liable for the costs. This is why smart fabricators do not manufacture until they can guarantee “hold” dimensions. As ductwork is fabricated off-site, there is no way to correct mistakes in the field.

Next, we will discuss the integration of the ductwork into the rest of the program in

Part 3: MEP coordination, BIM & CAD: how do Shop Drawings fit in?

go back to

Part 1: Taking the Mystery out of Construction Shop Drawings

Archives: 2014 - 2024

Resource Loaded CPM Scheduling Strategies

Resource loaded CPM scheduling pertains to developing schedules based on activity durations predicated on production rates and constraints of available personnel or resources. Many project...

On the Adoption of AI Construction Scheduling Platforms

Recently, there have been some exciting developments in the field of AI construction scheduling platforms – such as the generative  “optioneering” platform offered by Alice Technologies*: the...

The Politics of CPM Scheduling

I think of politics in CPM scheduling primarily as an apt euphemism for sleight of hand reporting and representation of what contractors are either incapable of, or unwilling to give, accurate and...

Construction Disruption Claims & How to Optimize Them

In comparison to delay claims, construction disruption claims are a slippery slope when it comes time to make a claim. That’s because delays have finite start and end dates, where there is no work...

MEP Coordination Strategies

It’s been almost 10 years since I published my 4 part series on MEP coordination, and I thought “what better way to commemorate the occasion than with an update.” In that time a lot has changed and a...

CPM Schedule Oversight Best Strategies

CPM schedule oversight is a concern of both contractors and stakeholders.  Contractors should know what to expect from oversight consultants when they submit their schedules for approval. It...

CPM Schedule Specifications & Requirements: are they a waste of paper?

CPM Schedule Specifications & Requirements are generally found in CSI division 01 32 00 Construction Progress Documentation of a project manual or specifications, where they are routinely ignored...

Construction Completion Schedules for Accurate Closeout

  Nothing quite resembles the mad scramble contractors do to close out the final segments of their projects. By this time, the project schedule has likely been deprecated into a chaotic parallel...

Construction Bid Schedules: What They Are and Why Contractors Should Use Them

In requests for pricing (RFPs) or invitations for bids (ITBs) there are a number of requests or requirements that typically fall under the radar. One such is a seldom observed request generally known...